"War is at first like a beautiful girl with whom all men long to play, but in the end like a repulsive hag whose suitors all weep and ache."
                -- Samuel Hanagid (993-1056)

Author Topic: Vikings (show)  (Read 24032 times)

Sir Brian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,735
  • Felix uxor beatam vitam - Happy Wife Happy Life
    • Order of the Marshal
Re: Vikings (show)
« Reply #30 on: 2014-05-17, 14:12:59 »
lol that was pretty early in the season! You've got a lot of catching up to do! ;)
"Chivalry our Strength, Brotherhood our sword"
Vert, on a Chief wavy Argent a Rose Sable,
a Gryphon Segreant Or

[img width=100 height=100]
<a href="http://s221.photobucket.com/user/Tah908/media/LP_Medals_zpsq7zzdvve.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i221.photobucket.

scott2978

  • Yeoman of the Order
  • Forum Follower
  • **
  • Posts: 195
  • Be generous, passionate, and resolute
    • Dice and Steel
Re: Vikings (show)
« Reply #31 on: 2014-05-17, 21:44:31 »
It really says something for the show that all the main characters have a deep and complex personality, and including several females roles that really shake off the common stereotypes. A powerful female character that you feel great respect for who is not mainly a sex object is so refreshing!

I think this is one of the great underrated shows these days. In my opinion, it's a better show than the more popular Game of Thrones series, which is really plagued with too many characters to split screen time with to give any sense of depth to most of them. Vikings seems to accomplish the perfect balance of show elements. Character growth, which makes a character seem more real, plot progression which drives the story along, fantastic sets to increase immersion, great looking costumes that although may not be historical look good nonetheless and lend a sense of character to the part, and the other usual elements such as great acting, writing and directing.

Scott

Aiden of Oreland

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ***
  • Posts: 926
  • Let faith be my shield and let joy be my steed
Re: Vikings (show)
« Reply #32 on: 2014-05-17, 22:17:04 »
It really says something for the show that all the main characters have a deep and complex personality, and including several females roles that really shake off the common stereotypes. A powerful female character that you feel great respect for who is not mainly a sex object is so refreshing!

I think this is one of the great underrated shows these days. In my opinion, it's a better show than the more popular Game of Thrones series, which is really plagued with too many characters to split screen time with to give any sense of depth to most of them. Vikings seems to accomplish the perfect balance of show elements. Character growth, which makes a character seem more real, plot progression which drives the story along, fantastic sets to increase immersion, great looking costumes that although may not be historical look good nonetheless and lend a sense of character to the part, and the other usual elements such as great acting, writing and directing.

Scott

I agree Scott from what I have seen, the characters also aren't entirely predictable. Though there are some very over dramatic parts. Question, are blood eagles real or was that just made for the show?
-"I raise not the sword, but the shield."-Aiden Max

Ian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,994
Re: Vikings (show)
« Reply #33 on: 2014-05-17, 22:39:13 »
Question, are blood eagles real or was that just made for the show?

Blood eagles are alluded to in the sagas.  There is little archaeological evidence that they were actually performed, so no one really can say for certain if they were just used in verse or in practice.
My YouTube Channel - Knyght Errant
My Pinterest

Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

Sir Edward

  • Forum Admin
  • Commander of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,340
  • Verum et Honorem.
    • ed.toton.org
Re: Vikings (show)
« Reply #34 on: 2014-05-18, 18:58:42 »

Personally, I've felt that Game of Thrones is the better of the two shows, but I'm really enjoying the high complexity of interwoven story lines, and the rise and fall of some characters that I didn't expect to see such growth from. But it's true, this is also the weakness of the series, since many characters die before we really get to know them, the bad guys usually win, and it has to jump around between half a dozen different groups of characters (or more) to keep the story moving.

Vikings is more focused, and the writing is decent. I do really appreciate the strong female characters as well.
Sir Ed T. Toton III
Knight Commander, Order of the Marshal

( Personal Site | My Facebook )