Once again I remind folks the purpose of this discussion is not to convince the Order to use steel weapons. It is to question a faulty way of thinking.
The premise that 'steel is dangerous' is what I'm questioning here and want to know based on what actual evidence is that so, if it is so at all.
So far we've acknowledged cost, wear and damage to gear, and eyes.
Cost is definitely higher for a quality steel weapon over a waster.
Wear and tear is a factor for mild steel, and maybe spring steels (but we have no testing on the spring steel aspect)
Eyes is based solely on 'aahhhh scary, 1 in a million is still a chance!" That's not evidence or statistics, it's literally superstition and hearsay. How do we find out how dangerous it really is? And we do know this could be mitigated with perf plate or slotted oculars.
So, right now for the added cost of steel weapons, and potentially upgraded armor with appropriate safety features (like perf plates or slotted oculars), it sounds like the physical evidence points to steel being safer than wood if you have the right stuff and are willing to spend the money.