Main > The Round Table

My confusion on Men at Arms, and Knights.

<< < (8/9) > >>

Aiden of Oreland:

--- Quote from: Ian on 2014-02-04, 21:23:09 ---
--- Quote from: Sir Aiden on 2014-02-04, 21:05:02 ---Maybe a knight  is considered a man at arms?

--- End quote ---

Yes Sir Aiden, all knights are considered men-at-arms.

--- End quote ---

:) im so proud of myself.

Sir Patrick:
Back in the day, Terry Gilliam used to do series on the "History" channel called Medieval Lives. The "Knight" episode featured John Hawkwood. Not a nice guy!  You can find it pretty easily on YouTube.

ADDED:  Check out "1066" by David Howart for some good background on Huscarls.

Lord Dane:

--- Quote from: Ian on 2014-02-04, 21:23:09 ---
--- Quote from: Sir Aiden on 2014-02-04, 21:05:02 ---Maybe a knight  is considered a man at arms?

--- End quote ---

Yes Sir Aiden, all knights are considered men-at-arms.

--- End quote ---

Just like all pages are considered "Squire lackeys" or "boys-with-arms" (to carry all my tourney gear around).  ;D

Sir Wolf:
their italian... of course there are no real knights hahaha jk jk

Sir James A:

--- Quote from: Sir Patrick on 2014-02-04, 22:26:42 ---Back in the day, Terry Gilliam used to do series on the "History" channel called Medieval Lives. The "Knight" episode featured John Hawkwood. Not a nice guy!  You can find it pretty easily on YouTube.

ADDED:  Check out "1066" by David Howart for some good background on Huscarls.

--- End quote ---

Ah! I have 7 or 8 episodes of that but haven't seen it yet. I think I need to do so. Thanks!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version