"Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds."
                -- Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882 - 1945)

Author Topic: Ironclad  (Read 12588 times)

Sir Wolf

  • He Who is Not to be Named
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,389
  • i have too many hats
    • man e faces
Ironclad
« on: 2009-01-30, 20:18:02 »
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1233301/

hmmm movie about poor ole King John. hope they don't screw it up.

Sir Griff

  • New Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #1 on: 2009-01-30, 21:27:22 »
The cast seems sound, especially with Paul Giamatti and several other actors such as Attenborough and Postlethwaite. And if James Purefoy also plays in this then I'll be damned if this film won't rock solely because of so great a cast.

About time another medieval movie was made. Haven't went to one for some time. I think Kingdom Of Heaven was my last one, but boy did it go out with a bang. They don't make movies like Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven these days.

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #2 on: 2010-10-26, 16:34:48 »
Big James Purefoy fan here...with him as the Marshal, I'll watch it just for that.  Great cast by the way.  Anyone seen Robin Hood yet?
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.â€

Sir James A

  • Weapons & Armor addict
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,043
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #3 on: 2010-10-27, 21:08:19 »
Big James Purefoy fan here...with him as the Marshal, I'll watch it just for that.  Great cast by the way.  Anyone seen Robin Hood yet?

Looking forward to Ironclad.

I saw the 2009 Robin Hood. It was crap. Pure, utter, crap. Words can't describe the atrocity. :( My wife said it was terrible, but my parents liked it. Of course, my parents have zero knowledge of medieval history, so as a pure "hollywood entertainer" it was fine. My wife said Robin Hood: Men In Tights was better and even more accurate - for reference, my wife isn't in SCA or anything medieval other than the MD Renn Fest once a year.
Knight, Order of the Marshal
Sable, a chevron between three lions statant Argent

Sir Patrick

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,647
  • Nex pro inhonesto, Deus pro totus.
    • The Order of the Marshal
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #4 on: 2010-10-28, 02:53:55 »
Agreed on Robin Hood.  I can't believe Ridley and Co. can sit there and taut the film's attention to historical detail with a straight face.  At least it was good armour porn.
Gules, a chevron argent between three cinquefoils ermine.
"Better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand as a lamb."
Knight, Order of the Marshal

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #5 on: 2010-10-28, 14:35:54 »
I never look to Hollywood for any sort of full-authenticity, as that sort of thing wouldn't sell out crowds.  Imagine realistic sword fights- we'd love them but the majority of the movie-going public wouldn't understand the stances or subtle nuances in it.

One of the reasons I liked Centurion was the the combat was quick and brutal, no Hollywood style of sword-bashing like you normally see.
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.â€

Sir Ulrich

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,177
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #6 on: 2012-04-11, 21:17:22 »
I just saw the film, I must say it was pretty good. Armor is depicted realistically as the hero got hit several times yet his armor held and the main armor is maille and padded aketons. Also saw a coat of plates too. The beginning opening of the film shows the maciejowski bible modified a bit and it was nice. It was violent too, very violent. Only thing I didnt like was the danes, they were depicted as pagans and they ripped off Braveheart a bit with blue warpaint and no armor.

Sir Edward

  • Forum Admin
  • Commander of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,340
  • Verum et Honorem.
    • ed.toton.org
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #7 on: 2012-04-12, 13:27:38 »

Yep, and they altered some of the historical details too. The wrong tower on the keep collapsed, for instance. Also, the pigs weren't burned alive, but rather pig fat was "painted" onto the supporting timbers in the tunnel. Baron Albini (or Aubigny, or whatever) never got touched by King John, he died in the keep.

Overall the film was well done though. I'm not too sure about Marshal's sword though. Looked a bit too huge for the period. :)
Sir Ed T. Toton III
Knight Commander, Order of the Marshal

( Personal Site | My Facebook )

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #8 on: 2012-04-12, 15:12:22 »
Big James Purefoy fan here...with him as the Marshal, I'll watch it just for that.  Great cast by the way.  Anyone seen Robin Hood yet?

Looking forward to Ironclad.

I saw the 2009 Robin Hood. It was crap. Pure, utter, crap. Words can't describe the atrocity. :( My wife said it was terrible, but my parents liked it. Of course, my parents have zero knowledge of medieval history, so as a pure "hollywood entertainer" it was fine. My wife said Robin Hood: Men In Tights was better and even more accurate - for reference, my wife isn't in SCA or anything medieval other than the MD Renn Fest once a year.

I think I've seen it about five or six times so far...I thoroughly enjoyed it!  It isn't a period piece, its a yarn...Robin Hood is just a story from antiquity that's been given legs by a number of different authors in different times- I liked that they showed a portrayal of him before he became the raider we all know and love.  I've never read another origin story for him so this was entertaining to say the least.  Most of the movies I've seen only touched lightly on his participation in the Crusades (if in fact he ever truly existed).  But even if he existed, how do we know the stories that have been passed down are about him?  Truth is, we don't...there's no real evidence to support it, but we all love him anyway.  What I don't get is how one portrayal is any more 'accurate' than the next?

What was pure, utter crap about it, Sir James?  I'll grant you, the weapons weren't great but they're Windlass pieces, and better than their usual stuff so not too bad.  The armor?  Or the lack of padded undergarments underneath?  That struck me from the beginning- Godfrey wears nothing under his maille except a thin tunic; his French is better than Robin's though.

I thought the fighting scenes were pretty good...for the most part.  King John flopped like a sack of potatoes on his horse and his sword strokes were laughable at best, but that's Hollywood as we know it.  William Hurt as the Marshal was uninspiring for me...but I am not a fan of his so there's that.
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.â€

Sir James A

  • Weapons & Armor addict
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,043
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #9 on: 2012-04-14, 00:50:58 »
What was pure, utter crap about it, Sir James?  I'll grant you, the weapons weren't great but they're Windlass pieces, and better than their usual stuff so not too bad.  The armor?  Or the lack of padded undergarments underneath?  That struck me from the beginning- Godfrey wears nothing under his maille except a thin tunic; his French is better than Robin's though.

Here's the relevant part from my older post: http://modernchivalry.org/forum/index.php/topic,752.msg6677.html#msg6677

I actually cringed at the "help me with my chainmail" part too. :)

I thought the combat was okay, but obviously had the hollywood "flair" to it, of course. I don't know why, but I had a hard time making sense of the movie.

(snipped)

Near the beginning when the king dies, my wife and I both said "wait, what?" because we haven't seen any other Robin Hood in which the king dies. Disney, Men in Tights .. the king comes back to put his brother in his place at the end.

I think they were going for some kind of link between Robin Hood and Masons/Freemasonry. I couldn't quite tell if it was intentional, or just clumsy coincidence. I never did figure out what they were trying to do with it, and again, I've never seen that in any other Robin Hood movie or story I've seen/read. (EDIT: This is in reference to where they talk about his father being a stone mason, and masons are the "in" thing lately - DaVinci code, etc)

Marian getting stuck underwater towards the end was another thing that bugged me. The boats crashing into each other made no sense, and as somebody with an archery background, the whole shooting a wet bow and arrow that distance with that accuracy made my toes twinge. Wet fletching? Wet bow string? Wet wood? Guess there had to be a dramatic superlucky/superhuman bow shot in the movie somewhere, right?

Aside from those things, I felt that all of the "merry men" were woefully underdeveloped and unused in the story. They have always been a bigger part to the story, especially with the time they spent together "before" the movie timeframe.

In the end, I ended up googling Robin Longstride to see if there was some sort of basis to the movie. I admittedly didn't look for a long time, but I couldn't find any reference to it. I thought perhaps the movie was taking a more historical basis than the "fairy tale" version that is more popular, and in the end, not finding that to be the case, it made me think a bit less of the movie too.

Crowe tried, but he did a mediocre at best Robin Hood. Part of it might be my subconscious link to him being in Gladiator, so others might not be so critical.
Knight, Order of the Marshal
Sable, a chevron between three lions statant Argent

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #10 on: 2012-04-16, 20:56:22 »
Well, to be fair, Richard did die before he ever returned to England, of an arrow, through the face I believe, the wound had turned septic- altho legend has it that it was a boy, and not a grown man, a cook, who did it.  Richard's mercenary captain, Mercadier, is said to have flayed the boy alive after the king died - even after Richard pardoned him for the act.  That part I learned from Prof Crouch's book on the Third Crusade...I'm pretty sure that's where I took that from.

The stonemason bit didn't strike me as looking for ties to the Masons...he really was a stonemason; those were blocks he laid to make that foundation to hide the original version of the Magna Carta in, that Robin later unearthed.  The Merry Men wouldn't have fit in as such- in the beginning they were archers and men-at-arms (according to the movie), I thought they were done well.  Remember, the Merry Men thing hadn't yet occurred til the end of the movie, altho Robin does utter the one line about being merry at the expense of that group that was taking Nottingham's grain to York.  I thought the movie laid the groundwork for future installments of Robin Hood and his Merry Men, if they decide to do it.

I wasn't super thrilled when I heard Crowe was doing Robin Hood but one thing he is good at is the stoic warrior type.  One other thing that stuck out for me was- where'd he learn to dance as a noble?  He is clearly leading the dance w/Marion during the harvest celebration- you'd think a common-born soldier would not have picked that up anywhere, unless he'd spent a lot of time at court but even then, being low-born would've meant he probably wasn't invited to the party all that much.  Just my op on that.
« Last Edit: 2012-04-16, 20:58:25 by Sir William »
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.â€

Sir James A

  • Weapons & Armor addict
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,043
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #11 on: 2012-04-16, 21:55:34 »
Neat, I didn't realize this one actually follows closer to history, regarding being a stone mason and Richard not returning. It didn't match what I was used to seeing, and seemed "off", since I don't remember any previous 'Hoods where he was a mason or where Richard didn't return and stuff John into his place. Great point on the dancing, too. It didn't even click with me. I did buy the DVD a little while back, maybe I should sit down and watch it again with a fresh perspective.
Knight, Order of the Marshal
Sable, a chevron between three lions statant Argent

Sir Edward

  • Forum Admin
  • Commander of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,340
  • Verum et Honorem.
    • ed.toton.org
Re: Ironclad
« Reply #12 on: 2012-04-17, 01:03:09 »

Yeah, most movies place Robin Hood a little earlier, while Richard is still alive and well. But they showed Richard die the way he really did, and in the correct year, except they skipped the 2-3 months of festering wound. But it was a crossbow bolt to the neck that did it.
Sir Ed T. Toton III
Knight Commander, Order of the Marshal

( Personal Site | My Facebook )