"Success is never final. Failure is never fatal. It is courage that counts."
                -- Winston Churchill

Author Topic: 4 to go?  (Read 9707 times)

Sir Ancelyn

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Follower
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
  • Lux Lucet in Tenebris
    • Thoughts from Firethorn
4 to go?
« on: 2010-10-20, 14:01:59 »
I have looked around at the posting stats for forum members and it looks like, after this post, I am just three messages away from forum based knighthood.  Should I go by Sir Adam or Sir Ancelyn? :-p

Sir Patrick

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,647
  • Nex pro inhonesto, Deus pro totus.
    • The Order of the Marshal
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #1 on: 2010-10-20, 14:08:22 »
I vote for Sir Ancelyn.  Sounds more period to me.  I didn't know we were suppossed to wait until 50 posts to start using honorifics in our screen names.  I've been the Red Knight since I was a page! ;)
Gules, a chevron argent between three cinquefoils ermine.
"Better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand as a lamb."
Knight, Order of the Marshal

Sir Edward

  • Forum Admin
  • Commander of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,340
  • Verum et Honorem.
    • ed.toton.org
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #2 on: 2010-10-20, 14:21:40 »

Hehe, we don't have any rules or customs on the forum, just a set of of forum titles. I set the entry to "knight" at 50 posts so people wouldn't be stuck as squires for years. :)
Sir Ed T. Toton III
Knight Commander, Order of the Marshal

( Personal Site | My Facebook )

Sir Ancelyn

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Follower
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
  • Lux Lucet in Tenebris
    • Thoughts from Firethorn
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #3 on: 2010-10-20, 16:22:04 »
Fair enough. Or perhaps Faire enough.  Still I'll take it.

Sir Brian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,735
  • Felix uxor beatam vitam - Happy Wife Happy Life
    • Order of the Marshal
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #4 on: 2010-10-20, 16:23:33 »

Hehe, we don't have any rules or customs on the forum, just a set of of forum titles. I set the entry to "knight" at 50 posts so people wouldn't be stuck as squires for years. :)

Sure beats having to muck out the stables for several years! ;)
"Chivalry our Strength, Brotherhood our sword"
Vert, on a Chief wavy Argent a Rose Sable,
a Gryphon Segreant Or

[img width=100 height=100]
<a href="http://s221.photobucket.com/user/Tah908/media/LP_Medals_zpsq7zzdvve.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i221.photobucket.

Dragonlover

  • Guest
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #5 on: 2010-10-21, 00:51:19 »

 And if you're an Elliott it's a totally mute and irrelevant issue..... ;)

Sir Ulrich

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,177
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #6 on: 2010-10-21, 01:17:58 »
Changed mine haha. Little long and redundant though.

Sir Ancelyn

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Follower
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
  • Lux Lucet in Tenebris
    • Thoughts from Firethorn
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #7 on: 2010-10-21, 01:56:22 »
True, our Clan has a long tradition of taking what it wants. period. :-D

Sir Patrick

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,647
  • Nex pro inhonesto, Deus pro totus.
    • The Order of the Marshal
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #8 on: 2010-10-21, 01:57:57 »
Hey, you went with Sir Ancelyn! :)
Gules, a chevron argent between three cinquefoils ermine.
"Better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand as a lamb."
Knight, Order of the Marshal

Sir Wolf

  • He Who is Not to be Named
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,389
  • i have too many hats
    • man e faces
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #9 on: 2010-10-21, 02:11:47 »
good on ya mates!

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: 4 to go?
« Reply #10 on: 2010-10-21, 14:40:14 »
Agreed!
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.â€