"War is at first like a beautiful girl with whom all men long to play, but in the end like a repulsive hag whose suitors all weep and ache."
                -- Samuel Hanagid (993-1056)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: sword more appropriate ?  (Read 4258 times)

Sir Wolf

  • He Who is Not to be Named
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,389
  • i have too many hats
    • man e faces
sword more appropriate ?
« on: 2010-07-18, 02:58:20 »
i have 2 swords that I am thinking of using for my kit. both are average 12th- early 14th century but i thought i would run by which one should i use?

i wish i could get the pommel off of it so i could grind down the center of the blade.

Logged

Sir Edward

  • Forum Admin
  • Commander of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,340
  • Verum et Honorem.
    • ed.toton.org
Re: sword more appropriate ?
« Reply #1 on: 2010-07-18, 22:17:29 »

I'd use the first one, with the disc pommel. It's viable for 12th-14th just fine, I think. The second piece doesn't work so well once you get into the mid 13th and beyond.
Logged
Sir Ed T. Toton III
Knight Commander, Order of the Marshal

( Personal Site | My Facebook )

Sir Brian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,735
  • Felix uxor beatam vitam - Happy Wife Happy Life
    • Order of the Marshal
Re: sword more appropriate ?
« Reply #2 on: 2010-07-19, 12:26:43 »
I agree. The first one is more appropriate for the timeline you're going for.
Logged
"Chivalry our Strength, Brotherhood our sword"
Vert, on a Chief wavy Argent a Rose Sable,
a Gryphon Segreant Or
[img width=100 height=100]
<a href="http://s221.photobucket.com/user/Tah908/media/LP_Medals_zpsq7zzdvve.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i221.photobucket.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »