"When a virtuous man is raised, it brings gladness to his friends, grief to his enemies, and glory to his posterity."
                -- Ben Jonson

Author Topic: Norman Conquest - 1066  (Read 9117 times)

LionPride32

  • New Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • New Member
Norman Conquest - 1066
« on: 2014-01-21, 02:31:24 »
I've focused most of my research and medieval studies on the 12th century Henry II/Richard I era, but as of late I've gon a bit further back and have been studying the Norman Conquest by our friend, Good Ol William the Bastard, who would of course win the battle of Hastings in 1066 and change the future of England for centuries. I admire his guts, and his warrior skills.

Any thoughts?

Sir Wolf

  • He Who is Not to be Named
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,389
  • i have too many hats
    • man e faces
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #1 on: 2014-01-21, 02:59:21 »
he came, he saw, he kicked harolds ass lolol

its a great time period to learn about. i have a ton of books on the subject when i used to reenact it

Sir Nate

  • Nathan
  • Yeoman of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • **
  • Posts: 1,702
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #2 on: 2014-01-21, 03:45:43 »
he came, he saw, he kicked harolds ass lolol

its a great time period to learn about. i have a ton of books on the subject when i used to reenact it

I like Norman combat, and art. Probably just that whole era fascinates me. I should really learn more about it.( Netflix documentary's most likely)
Nathan Phillip Max
Knight of the Order
"Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil"

Sir Patrick

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,647
  • Nex pro inhonesto, Deus pro totus.
    • The Order of the Marshal
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #3 on: 2014-01-21, 03:48:43 »
Check out "1066" by David Howarth. Great resource.
Gules, a chevron argent between three cinquefoils ermine.
"Better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand as a lamb."
Knight, Order of the Marshal

Sir Rodney

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,118
  • Inquit Corvus
    • The Mercenary Company Nevermore
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #4 on: 2014-01-21, 04:52:08 »
Check out "1066" by David Howarth. Great resource.

A second for “1066” by David Howarth.

I would also recommend “The Year 1000” by Robert Lacey & Danny Danziger.  At 200 pages, it’s a light read over a few evenings and contains a nice bibliography as well as source notes.  Though set 66 years before the conquest, it gives you a very good idea of everyday life just prior to William’s ships appearing on the horizon.
"Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can say Ni at will to old ladies. There is a pestilence upon this land, nothing is sacred. Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress in this period in history." - Roger the Shrubber

Timothy

  • "The whole of heraldry and of chivalry is in courtesy" Ralph Waldo Emerson
  • Yeoman of the Order
  • Forum Follower
  • **
  • Posts: 197
  • Amateur Herald of Arms
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #5 on: 2014-01-21, 04:54:30 »
Gentleman, it is my understanding that Harold was winning and if he had stayed in place on his hill he wound have won.
Not sure  why he moved but move he did and as they say the rest is history. Harold's line rejoins the line of English kings with Edward III.
[br Barry Or and Vert surmounting a Bend counterchanged],
a Lion rampant armed and langued Gules
 an Orle of eight Trefoils slipped Sable counterchanged Or .

Sir Patrick

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,647
  • Nex pro inhonesto, Deus pro totus.
    • The Order of the Marshal
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #6 on: 2014-01-21, 05:23:25 »
If I recall, part of Harold's line broke ranks to finish off a contingent of Norman infantry that had gotten bogged down in a marshy area. This left a gap that Willam's knights exploited to achieve victory.
Gules, a chevron argent between three cinquefoils ermine.
"Better to live one day as a lion, than a thousand as a lamb."
Knight, Order of the Marshal

Sir Wolf

  • He Who is Not to be Named
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,389
  • i have too many hats
    • man e faces
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #7 on: 2014-01-21, 11:36:39 »
could never understand early cavalry like Harold's.  They road up to battle on horses then got off of them to fight on the field. were as Williams stayed in the saddle to fight... new concept to war.

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #8 on: 2014-01-21, 18:51:14 »
Check out "1066" by David Howarth. Great resource.
A second for “1066” by David Howarth.

And I will give a third reference for the book by Howarth; an excellent starting resource for that period.
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.”

Sir James A

  • Weapons & Armor addict
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,043
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #9 on: 2014-01-21, 18:53:48 »
No discussion of King Harold is complete without:


You'll shoot your eye out!
Knight, Order of the Marshal
Sable, a chevron between three lions statant Argent

Sir Edward

  • Forum Admin
  • Commander of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,340
  • Verum et Honorem.
    • ed.toton.org
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #10 on: 2014-01-22, 01:37:00 »
No discussion of King Harold is complete without:


You'll shoot your eye out!

Sir James just won the internets. ;)
Sir Ed T. Toton III
Knight Commander, Order of the Marshal

( Personal Site | My Facebook )

LionPride32

  • New Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • New Member
Re: Norman Conquest - 1066
« Reply #11 on: 2014-02-06, 22:37:21 »
How exactly does Harolds line make a comeback through Edward III??