Main > The Round Table

Knighthood, and what others think of you.

<< < (2/3) > >>

Sir Rodney:

--- Quote from: Sir Brian on 2011-02-03, 01:46:53 ---...for truly the iron is really in the heart and soul of the knight and not in his harness.  :)

--- End quote ---

Well said.  If I may add "in his harness or belt".  For those not aware, the wearing a white belt is a restricted honor for SCA knights.  The vast majority of SCA knights carry themselves as a true knight should.  In all my years in the SCA I've only once had  the misfortune of encountering one individual who seemed to think the color of his belt "entitled" him.  I will never forget this singular negative encounter, nor will I let it cloud the hundreds of positive encounters with true knights I've had the good fortune to cross blades with.

Sir Edward:

--- Quote from: Rodney on 2011-02-04, 04:58:13 ---Well said.  If I may add "in his harness or belt".  For those not aware, the wearing a white belt is a restricted honor for SCA knights. 

--- End quote ---

Yeah, I think that's pretty unique to the SCA though. The historical basis for it comes from some of the early writings describing the knighting ceremonies, but historically the most commonly worn symbol of knighthood was the gilded spurs. Later on toward the renaissance this was often replaced with a chain.


--- Quote from: Rodney on 2011-02-04, 04:58:13 ---In all my years in the SCA I've only once had  the misfortune of encountering one individual who seemed to think the color of his belt "entitled" him.  I will never forget this singular negative encounter, nor will I let it cloud the hundreds of positive encounters with true knights I've had the good fortune to cross blades with.

--- End quote ---

That's good to hear. At Pennsic I remember overhearing a conversation at our camp, where someone was expressing the opinion that most of the knights were arrogant and elitist. One of the fighters made the point that it's true of some, but not all. It really does boil down to attempting to judge a group based on what a few individuals have done.

I think sometimes the person making the judgment will have their opinion influenced greatly by their own personality and personal history. Some people immediately dislike any sort of Order or private club, with the assumption that it must be elitist. The SCA Order of Chivalry I'm sure is no exception here.

Joshua Santana:

--- Quote ---Much of the advice I received during my vigil was spot on. Nothing rings more true than those who told me that "people are watching you now and will evaluate many of your actions, choosing what is good or bad and counting them in baskets of each." Watching this thread has really reinforced that for me. You should continue to do so and be unapologetic. That's my job, in a way. I could have said "No", but I took the belt, spurs, and chain. I accept that.

For those of you who aspire to knighthood, remember this condition of the accolade as you progress. You'll be just like the rest of us - imperfect. You might be the name an encouraging mother whispers in the ear of a suckling infant, or the name a father spits in admonition with a wagging finger.
--- End quote ---


--- Quote ---the iron is really in the heart and soul of the knight and not in his harness.
--- End quote ---

This really comes to show that True Knighthood and Chivalry is more that just a Code we all live by, it is more than a Philosophy that can be used in debates, it is more than a Title for Valor or for Honor. Whether it may be in HEMA, SCA, Adrian Empire, Markland Medieval Mercenary Militia or other Chivalric Orders, our choices and what we do in the presence of others is how we define Chivalry and Knighthood.  It is a Life style and a Path in Life.  This is my take on this and I have Faith in the fact that by leading my life in a Knightly Manner, I become myself but ennobled and courageous to take on Life itself and being able to do deeds with a Purpose.

This almost reminds me of the phrase "Deeds themselves are useless unless they are for some higher purpose." (King Arthur)

To me, Chivalry is the Code and Philosophy, the why we do, what we do.  Knighthood is the manner, the intention, the will and the rule of thumb for Life and daily choices. 

As far as anyone think of me as a Knight, that is their discretion.  I have seen people that refuse to believe in Chivalry, I have seen people that say I am crazy, insane or more recently that I am anachronistic.  But do I need to pay attention to them or listen to them.  I have that choice, or I can do something that is Chivalrous in front of other people and let them decided.  They may see one thing that is different from the other, but that will never change who i am as a man, and as a Knight.   

Thorsteinn:
I started that thread a long time ago on the AA.

Is it still alive?

Sir William:
It lives on...here.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version