EDIT: Forgot to translate my CoA. Gules is for magnamity and fortitude; the cinquefoil represents strength, loyalty, and honor; and the chevron denotes protection. To me, the whole thing is basically a warning to oppresors and predators: I will defend the innocent and the weak against you.
Ours is somewhat similar, then. On mine:
* The chevron denotes a protective wall
* The two lions at the top are my wife and I - statant as we are calm protectors
* The lion on the lower portion inside the chevron is symbolic of the family we protect
* Black (field) represents the darkness/evil that surrounds us
* Gold is for nobility, and as a contrast to the darkness around us (figuratively speaking)
I just thought of something else...how do we, or do we have the surcoats match the CoA? A la Sir Brian's?
Question along those lines; I think the chevron may look strange on a surcoat. Would a solid-colored surcoat, with an actual shield with the heraldry placed in the center, chest and/or back, ending a bit above belt level be anywhere near historically correct? I've seen it in a few places, but I think it was movies/games, and can't remember or find any historical pictures.
Similar to this (
http://api.ning.com/files/3voowQUZK4xdg49h0OByx9R-dXiHe5dpy2NGH1A1kM0mutBTx8fK5QvwjbJfMrfvdrP2Exv8R8uQI*9MHasLvP-MdNF0hvjY/124910d1245232185ridleyscottsrobinhood2010russellcrowerobinhoodset04.jpg) probably on a white (or lighter colored) surcoat for contrast.
In what may be a rather controvercial question (and if it rocks the boat too much, let me know!), what prevented you (as in any members!) from joining one of the existing chivalric organizations? I only ask out of curiosity - it's exciting to see a new group come up!
There's a few reasons I have.
I don't know of any Orders around my area. I like the people here. I dislike both the politics, rules, and "rankings" in the SCA. Specifically the people who try to force their personal beliefs on their group once they get "in power". The other half-peeve is picking a "persona". I have a variety of interests, 14th-16th century Italian, Gothic, and English armor; I wouldn't be able to pick a favorite to portray. By picking a persona, picking a name, and "dressing up" ... it feels like it LARP/Harry Potter/Twilight/LotR, teen/tween make-believe time. I also don't see much "meat" in it to interest me; other than the sport of rattan combat (which is secondary to learning real swordsmanship), the events and activities haven't appealed much to me, though it may just be lack of good activites locally; but that, again, brings about the "no interesting local groups" back into the equation.
The last lingering bit is that I have a very busy schedule; stainless armor, while "the work of the devil" to many, means that I can avoid spending 15 hours every 6-8 weeks cleaning off rust and doing maintenance (I have a few harnesses and the mild steel is VERY frustrating at times). I noticed last week my gothic harness is starting to rust under the straps, and it's yet to even be worn (finishing the arming coat/points/etc).
The "You should really consider using period steel. And period wool. And period flax." bothers me, as I'm far, far more interested in the knights themselves and how it feels to wear the armor. Especially since it's not plastic, and the SCA is not a Living History group. Easy maintenance is a priority over historical accuracy for most things for me, as long as it presents a good attempt at a historical appearance. Finding an armorer to work in stainless? Not so pleasant.
(Edit by Ed, fixed URL for image)