"Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds."
                -- Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882 - 1945)

Author Topic: mail on hands but not on fingers  (Read 3997 times)

Sir Wolf

  • He Who is Not to be Named
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,389
  • i have too many hats
    • man e faces

Sir Wolf

  • He Who is Not to be Named
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,389
  • i have too many hats
    • man e faces
Re: mail on hands but not on fingers
« Reply #1 on: 2014-10-11, 16:47:56 »
also note the garters below the knees and the ties at the ankles.

and what is that tunic trim below the mail hem line?

back of the shield? artistic license or decorated?

Sir Rodney

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,118
  • Inquit Corvus
    • The Mercenary Company Nevermore
Re: mail on hands but not on fingers
« Reply #2 on: 2014-10-13, 03:55:02 »
It appears to my eyes that his left hand is fully mailed while his right hand has no mail on the fingers.  Am I seeing that correctly?

I don’t believe the tunic trim and the back-of-shield decoration can be solely attributed to artistic license.  There must be other pictorial evidence for both of these things.
"Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can say Ni at will to old ladies. There is a pestilence upon this land, nothing is sacred. Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress in this period in history." - Roger the Shrubber

Sir Nate

  • Nathan
  • Yeoman of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • **
  • Posts: 1,702
Re: mail on hands but not on fingers
« Reply #3 on: 2014-10-13, 04:26:43 »
also note the garters below the knees and the ties at the ankles.

and what is that tunic trim below the mail hem line?

back of the shield? artistic license or decorated?
Early for of Aketon ;)

I don't have an idea of why the Mail does not cover the fingers. Maybe the artist had someone in particular in mind when they drew this.
Why someone would have that opening I shine would be for more finger usage/ or they couldn't afford that little bit of extra mail because they forgot about sales tax, and the smith removed that bit.
Those are my thoughts.
It appears to my eyes that his left hand is fully mailed while his right hand has no mail on the fingers.  Am I seeing that correctly?

I don’t believe the tunic trim and the back-of-shield decoration can be solely attributed to artistic license.  There must be other pictorial evidence for both of these things.


No both hands are missing mail over the fingers.

Quick question: did mail gloves with spectate fingers exist or where their just mittens?
Nathan Phillip Max
Knight of the Order
"Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil"

Sir Douglas

  • Artificer of Stuff and Things
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 815
  • In principio creavit Deus caelum et terram.
Re: mail on hands but not on fingers
« Reply #4 on: 2014-10-14, 14:47:40 »
Quick question: did mail gloves with spectate fingers exist or where their just mittens?

If we're to take them at face value, there are a number of images that depict fingered mail. The Mac Bible has some.
Per pale azure and argent, an eagle displayed per pale argent and sable, armed and langued or.

So a Norman, a Saxon, and a Viking walk into England....