Greetings my dear sirs,
I am in the process of writing my sequel and have a few questions to resolve before I can truly write a scene. Here is the overall premise to give you background:
I have two groups of warriors during the time of Charlemagne, (early 9th century), who are traveling to Paris where the Frankish army is besieged. Therefore, they are not reporting to a war summons where they would be expected to show up at a gathering point with several months' worth of provisions, but rather they are joining the war in progress. I wish to have the two groups come upon each other while they are both hunting the same deer and quarrel at first as to whose can claim the kill.
The first group has seven warriors and ten horses. Having a wagon would slow them down, so I decided upon using three horses to serve as pack animals and will be led by three different riders.
Here are my questions:
The Romans built their roads as straight as possible and their purpose was primarily for the movement of troops, but secondarily for commerce. Would they have avoided forests or would they have built a road straight through them?
If there weren't Roman roads through forests, then would taking a hunting trail through a forest be considered a shortcut OR would it take longer to travel that way even if the distance was less?
I am wondering if hunting trails are essentially just a path in the words and not suitable for two horses to travel side-by-side, thus negating the ability for a group of warriors who are traveling with pack horses to use such a route.
All I really need is a plausible explanation for these two groups of soldiers to meet up on their travels and to do so while hunting.
Any thoughts, insights, suggestions on these questions would be welcomed.