Miscellaneous > The Sallyport
too quiet today
Sir Nate:
It just dawned on me, That if we discussed what is better Lord of the rings or the hobbit.
Or wether they were good or not.(more dangerous than other topics.)
There will be Blood.
Sir Edward:
--- Quote from: Sir Nate on 2013-12-13, 02:44:19 ---This is how I feel, on Christmas morning. Im sauruman and my family is the rest.
--- End quote ---
That is one of the better ones, I think. This one was good too:
Sir William:
Well, LOTR was more of an epic tale than the Hobbit; I haven't seen the second one yet but what I've heard isn't too reassuring. More like PJ took a great story and turned it into a flashy Hollywood epic, but somehow the source material got left behind in some way. As I said, haven't seen it, loved the first one though.
Sir Wolf:
ya i mean he's gotta do something to update it for stupid audience peoples, the hobbit was a childrens story based outta ww1 lol
Aiden of Oreland:
What a lot of people don't realize is that the Hobbit movies include more detail than the book. Which doesn't always happen. So I have found the motion pictures to be better. The book kinda lacks detail in some areas. Believe me that they are no LoTR. The movies go more in depth in a sense. Don't get me wrong, usually books are better than the movie based on it (don't get me started with the Percy Jackson and The Olympians movie), but I have to disagree with the hobbit. Also, it is hard to make the Hobbit as good as LoTR because the Hobbit is like "I'M GOING ON AN ADVENTURE!!!" and LoTR is like "I must go on a quest to decide the fate of the world. If i don't succeed every one dies" I believe the Hobbit is as good as it is going to get as a movie. Haha by the way... The boogie monster checks his closet every night for... Chuck Noris.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version