ModernChivalry.org

Miscellaneous => The Sallyport => Topic started by: Sir Ancelyn on 2010-10-20, 14:01:59

Title: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Ancelyn on 2010-10-20, 14:01:59
I have looked around at the posting stats for forum members and it looks like, after this post, I am just three messages away from forum based knighthood.  Should I go by Sir Adam or Sir Ancelyn? :-p
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Patrick on 2010-10-20, 14:08:22
I vote for Sir Ancelyn.  Sounds more period to me.  I didn't know we were suppossed to wait until 50 posts to start using honorifics in our screen names.  I've been the Red Knight since I was a page! ;)
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Edward on 2010-10-20, 14:21:40

Hehe, we don't have any rules or customs on the forum, just a set of of forum titles. I set the entry to "knight" at 50 posts so people wouldn't be stuck as squires for years. :)
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Ancelyn on 2010-10-20, 16:22:04
Fair enough. Or perhaps Faire enough.  Still I'll take it.
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Brian on 2010-10-20, 16:23:33

Hehe, we don't have any rules or customs on the forum, just a set of of forum titles. I set the entry to "knight" at 50 posts so people wouldn't be stuck as squires for years. :)

Sure beats having to muck out the stables for several years! ;)
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Dragonlover on 2010-10-21, 00:51:19

 And if you're an Elliott it's a totally mute and irrelevant issue..... ;)
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Ulrich on 2010-10-21, 01:17:58
Changed mine haha. Little long and redundant though.
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Ancelyn on 2010-10-21, 01:56:22
True, our Clan has a long tradition of taking what it wants. period. :-D
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Patrick on 2010-10-21, 01:57:57
Hey, you went with Sir Ancelyn! :)
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir Wolf on 2010-10-21, 02:11:47
good on ya mates!
Title: Re: 4 to go?
Post by: Sir William on 2010-10-21, 14:40:14
Agreed!