"You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind next to honor."
                -- James Allen

Author Topic: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?  (Read 19625 times)

Thorsteinn

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,470
A question of Honor came up today:

Imagine two fighters reach finals of an SCA Crown/Coronet. X beats Y after a hard fought match. In that moment of victory X suddenly realizes that Y would make a great King/Prince, while X would not. X then declares Y to be the winner for Y would be who X would want for the Crown/Coronet.

Is X being dishonorable? Is X wrong?
Fall down seven, get up eight.

Sir Brian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,735
  • Felix uxor beatam vitam - Happy Wife Happy Life
    • Order of the Marshal
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #1 on: 2014-06-13, 09:15:18 »
I would say that is very honorable. Also humble and noble of X for he put the welfare of the kingdom ahead of his own glory. Whether he was correct or not in his self estimation of his qualifications to rule, he relinquished the glory of victory for an even greater and more noble accolade. Truly your kingdom is blessed to have such honorable knights to serve them.  :)
"Chivalry our Strength, Brotherhood our sword"
Vert, on a Chief wavy Argent a Rose Sable,
a Gryphon Segreant Or

[img width=100 height=100]
<a href="http://s221.photobucket.com/user/Tah908/media/LP_Medals_zpsq7zzdvve.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i221.photobucket.

Ian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,994
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #2 on: 2014-06-13, 13:01:28 »
Within the bounds of the SCA I think that's kind of weird.  A crown tournament's sole purpose is to determine the next King right?  And a tournament is the only way that Kings are determined in the SCA.  You know before entering that you're fighting for that title and that title alone.  If you think you'd be a bad king, why would you enter the tournament in the first place?  It seems like a question that should have been answered before taking the field.  It's one thing if he just feels like the other guy would be better, but if fighter X felt he would make a bad king from the start he should not have entered the tournament.

I think it puts fighter Y in an awkward position.  If he is king now, he knows he did not earn it through combat at arms, which is the SCA way.  So that could affect his ability as King.  It may cause him to second guess his validity.
My YouTube Channel - Knyght Errant
My Pinterest

Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #3 on: 2014-06-13, 13:41:33 »
Maybe X just wanted the competition; I'm confused, what exactly does 'rule' entail that he would be bad at it?
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.â€

Sir James A

  • Weapons & Armor addict
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,043
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #4 on: 2014-06-13, 19:27:53 »
I second Sir Ian's question about SCA context in it. If suitability as a King is determined solely through martial combat, and X has beaten Y, then shouldn't X be king. What qualification(s) is it with Y that makes X think that Y should be king instead? And why would this suddenly be recognized at the end of a tournament bout?

If I threw myself into that as Y, I would decline X's offer as having not been legitimately beaten by him/her.

If I threw myself into that as X, I would take the crown as earned, and when able to speak with Y privately, tell them I feel they would make a better King and ask if they wish to take over. I could see it as being very demeaning to Y for X to imply "I beat you and I earned this, but you take it instead"; it's being given something that wasn't earned.
Knight, Order of the Marshal
Sable, a chevron between three lions statant Argent

Sir Douglas

  • Artificer of Stuff and Things
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Acolyte
  • ****
  • Posts: 815
  • In principio creavit Deus caelum et terram.
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #5 on: 2014-06-13, 19:37:51 »
Hmmm...I don't know. That's a toughie there. I agree that it would be noble of X to step down if he didn't feel he could reign properly, but at the same time, I also agree that it puts Y in an awkward position.

Granted, I'm not really familiar with SCA rules so take this for what it's worth, but I think it depends on the circumstance. Did X go in with the intent to win, but had some last-minute "epiphany" after he had won? In that case, I think the thing to do would to be discuss it with Y and make sure he was okay with accepting the reign instead of just saying, "Y'know what? I don't really wanna be king. It's all on Y now."

Or did he go into the competition with no desire to be king and just want to fight or want bragging rights?

Basically, I guess it kind of depends on whether X had some kind of ulterior motive, or if was it an honest change of heart.


Edit: ninja'd by Sir James.
« Last Edit: 2014-06-13, 19:39:29 by DouglasTheYounger »
Per pale azure and argent, an eagle displayed per pale argent and sable, armed and langued or.

So a Norman, a Saxon, and a Viking walk into England....

Sir William

  • Cogito ergo sum
  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,154
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #6 on: 2014-06-13, 20:28:25 »
Quote
If I threw myself into that as Y, I would decline X's offer as having not been legitimately beaten by him/her.

If I threw myself into that as X, I would take the crown as earned, and when able to speak with Y privately, tell them I feel they would make a better King and ask if they wish to take over. I could see it as being very demeaning to Y for X to imply "I beat you and I earned this, but you take it instead"; it's being given something that wasn't earned.

That begs the question- did Y in fact take the crown from X?  If X is honorable to accede the throne, is Y necessarily honorable in taking it- since it has been noted that victory via trial by combat is the only way to take it?
The Black Knight, Order of the Marshal
'Per Pale Azure and Sable, a Chevron counterchanged fimbriated argent.' 
“Pride makes a man, it drives him, it is the shield wall around his reputation.  Men die, but reputation does not.â€

Sir Edward

  • Forum Admin
  • Commander of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,340
  • Verum et Honorem.
    • ed.toton.org
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #7 on: 2014-06-13, 20:46:21 »

I find it hard to decide as well. On one hand, I agree with Sir Brian's assessment about his selfless and honorable act to concede, based on his assessment of their relative ability to lead as King.

But... if I were the one who lost the fight, I would feel I didn't earn that position. That it needed to be gifted to me. It would be a hollow "victory", because it was gained in defeat.

Sir Ed T. Toton III
Knight Commander, Order of the Marshal

( Personal Site | My Facebook )

Ian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,994
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #8 on: 2014-06-13, 21:23:21 »
I just think it comes down to the fact that no one should enter a Crown Tourney that they don't want to win.  It's not a secret that the reason the tournament exists is to determine the new King.  If you don't want to be King, don't compete in the one thing that's sole purpose is to become the King.  There are plenty of other opportunities to fight and compete. 

Did fighter X just suddenly have this realization at the end, after he won?
My YouTube Channel - Knyght Errant
My Pinterest

Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

Sir Brian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,735
  • Felix uxor beatam vitam - Happy Wife Happy Life
    • Order of the Marshal
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #9 on: 2014-06-14, 07:28:10 »
Did fighter X just suddenly have this realization at the end, after he won?

That very well could be the case as this is discussion is nothing more than hypothetical and based upon rudimentary information, it could have been a situation where X was so focused on the combat aspects of the tournament that he didn't truly consider all his qualities needed to truly lead until during the tournament when he had perhaps witnessed Y's qualities were greater than his own?  :-\
"Chivalry our Strength, Brotherhood our sword"
Vert, on a Chief wavy Argent a Rose Sable,
a Gryphon Segreant Or

[img width=100 height=100]
<a href="http://s221.photobucket.com/user/Tah908/media/LP_Medals_zpsq7zzdvve.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i221.photobucket.

Thorsteinn

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,470
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #10 on: 2014-06-14, 17:10:58 »
Yes, it was an in situ realization. The point being that hot fighters don't necessarily make great Kings. That no one ever talks about winning and saying "bet the other guy/girl would have done better".

Quote
In that moment of victory X suddenly realizes that Y would make a great King/Prince, while X would not.
Fall down seven, get up eight.

Ian

  • Knight of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,994
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #11 on: 2014-06-14, 19:15:02 »
The point being that hot fighters don't necessarily make great Kings.

True, but someone forgot to tell the SCA that because that's the only way to make a King!
My YouTube Channel - Knyght Errant
My Pinterest

Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

Lord Chagatai

  • Yeoman of the Order
  • Forum Follower
  • **
  • Posts: 188
  • New Member
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #12 on: 2014-06-14, 23:13:44 »
Well...while honorable I think the SCA and reigning royalty would have an issue with it cause it goes against the oath that you as a fighter took at the beginning of the tournament. It also goes against the letter of intent that you, along with your consort, sent into the crown to fight in the first place. And if you did that what would it do to the honor of your consort, who thinks you would make a good king or would not have agreed to be your consort?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Thorsteinn

  • Squire of the Order
  • Forum Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,470
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #13 on: 2014-06-14, 23:55:11 »
Quote
And if you did that what would it do to the honor of your consort, who thinks you would make a good king or would not have agreed to be your consort?

That's a whole different Kettle of Fish. Just ask Viscount Annora Rains of Cynagua whom became Princess cause the nice Knight asked the day before the lists, not knowing he had won the Coronet several times before and was known to be an absentee Prince. Were it not for the fact she was a member of the war unit Tribe RotMahne she'd have been screwed.

Well not to mention he thought he'd get laid for winning, even though she said she'd not sleep with him just cause she was his consort this causing innumerable problems, especially when she started dating her Ex again midway through the reign (it's OK now, she & her Ex since married and are very very awesome people).

I asked the same question on a Facebook page called Ask The Knights.
Fall down seven, get up eight.

Lord Chagatai

  • Yeoman of the Order
  • Forum Follower
  • **
  • Posts: 188
  • New Member
Re: Is it Honorable to win, then say the loser should reign?
« Reply #14 on: 2014-06-15, 03:38:26 »
Quote
And if you did that what would it do to the honor of your consort, who thinks you would make a good king or would not have agreed to be your consort?

That's a whole different Kettle of Fish. Just ask Viscount Annora Rains of Cynagua whom became Princess cause the nice Knight asked the day before the lists, not knowing he had won the Coronet several times before and was known to be an absentee Prince. Were it not for the fact she was a member of the war unit Tribe RotMahne she'd have been screwed.

Well not to mention he thought he'd get laid for winning, even though she said she'd not sleep with him just cause she was his consort this causing innumerable problems, especially when she started dating her Ex again midway through the reign (it's OK now, she & her Ex since married and are very very awesome people).

I asked the same question on a Facebook page called Ask The Knights.

My point exactly...and that was not very knightly of him...I would of recommended to take his spurs, chain and belt away....

I am also a member of ask the knights on facebook....as a squire I find it very informative...

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD